Home
About Us
Issues
Authors
Reviewers
Users
Subscription
Our Other Journals
Neonatal Database
Neonatal Database Download
Neonatal Journal Abstracts
Feedback
Salient Features
Open Access
Editorial Board
Publisher
Publication Ethics & Malpractice
Journal Policy
Peer Review Process
Contact Us
Current Issue
Forthcoming
Article Archive
Access Statistics
Simple Search
Advanced Search
IJNMR Performance
Submit an Article
Instructions
Assistance
Publication Fee
Paid Services
Apply As Reviewer
Acknowledgment
Register Here
Register For Article Submission
Login Here
Login For Article Submission
Annual
Buy One Issue
Payment Options
How to Order
JCDR
IJARS
NJLM

 

Welcome : Guest

Users Online :

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Case report

Year :2021 Month : July Volume : 9 Issue : 3 Page : PC01 - PC03 Full Version

Multiple Bone Fractures in a Neonate with Osteogenesis Imperfecta: A Case Report


Rakesh Kumar, Prerna Chamoli
1. Assistant Professor, Department of Paediatrics, Himalayan Institute of Medical Sciences, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India. 2. Junior Resident, Department of Paediatrics, Himalayan Institute of Medical Sciences, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India.
 
Correspondence Address :
Rakesh Kumar,
Department of Paediatrics, Himalayan Institute of Medical Sciences, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India.
E-mail: drrakesh99@yahoo.com
 
ABSTRACT

: Osteogenesis Imperfecta (OI) is characterised by increased bone fractures. It is clinically and genetically a heterozygous disease of connective tissues. OI type 3 is the most severe, non lethal form which is caused by the mutation of caused by mutation of procollagen type1 A1 or A2(COL1A1 or COL1A2) genes. A one-day-old male baby with respiratory distress and multiple limb deformities was presented to the paediatric emergency department. The head appeared unduly large in comparison to the body and the anterior, posterior and lateral fontanelle were wide open. Sclera did not appear blue. Both upper limbs appeared short and stubby with diffuse swelling in the left arm. Both lower limbs appeared curved and were held in a frog-like position. Infantogram showed multiple calvarial fractures in the skull, multiple rib fractures, fracture of left humerus, bilateral ulna, left femur and there were multiple areas with callus formation suggestive of intrauterine fractures. There was no history of trauma during birth. Clinical diagnosis of OI was made and the neonate was managed medically. Genetic analysis could not be done owing to financial constraints. In conclusion, a high index of suspicion and careful clinical and radiological evaluation can identify very rare hereditary abnormalities like OI.
Keywords : Brittle bones, Connective tissues, Newborn
DOI and Others : 10.7860/IJNMR/2021/49205.2302

Date of Submission: Mar 02, 2021
Date of Peer Review: Apr 20, 2021
Date of Acceptance: Jun 29, 2021
Date of Publishing: Sep 30, 2021

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Mar 03, 2021
• Manual Googling: Jun
 
Case Report

A one-day-old male neonate was referred to paediatric emergency with complaints of respiratory distress. The neonate was born to a 32-year-old P2L2 mother with no history of consanguinity. Mother had irregular antenatal visits without any iron/folic acid supplementation. Ultrasound examination was not done. There was no history of taking any teratogenic drug or exposure to radiation. There was no history of any bone disease or history of repeated fractures in the family. The baby was delivered at 37 weeks of gestation by spontaneous vaginal delivery with an Appearance Pulse Grimace (reflex) Activity Respiration (APGAR) score of 8,9,9 with a birth weight of 3000 grams. There was no history of birth trauma to the baby as described by parents.

At presentation baby was in a frog-like position and seemed in agony, colour was pink, temperature 36.8°C, respiratory rate of 72 breaths per minute with no signs of distress, heart rate of 136 per minute, capillary refill time was less than two seconds, and oxygen saturation of 74% by pulse oximetry on room air. The head appeared unduly large in comparison to the body and the anterior fontanelle was wide open measuring 4×4 cms and pulsatile. Posterior fontanelle was also wide and sutures were widely separated, lateral fontanelle was also open. Sclera did not appear blue. Both upper limbs appeared short and stubby with diffuse swelling in the left arm. Both lower limbs appeared curved with legs being more curved than the thighs, lower limbs were held in a frog-like position (Table/Fig 1). Subcutaneous crepitus was present in the left arm and the neonate had a shrill cry on the movement of the left arm. The chest appeared normal. Pan systolic murmur was present with maximal intensity in the right parasternal area in the 4th intercostal space. The abdomen was protuberant with no organomegaly and the bilateral testis were undescended.

The baby was provisionally diagnosed with OI and relevant investigations were suggested. Infantogram showed multiple calvarial fractures in the skull, multiple rib fractures, fracture of left humerus, bilateral ulna, left femur and there were multiple areas with callus formation suggestive of intrauterine fractures (Table/Fig 2). Blood tests revealed normal morphology and count of blood cells and the C-reactive protein was negative. Laboratory values for Calcium (C), Phosphorus (P) and Alkaline phosphatase (ALKP) (Ca: 7.2 mg/dL (range 8.8-10.6 mg/dL), PO4: 6.8 mg/dL (range 2.5-4.5 mg/dL), ALP-146 IU/L (range 30-120 IU/dL), 25-hydroxyvitamin D level was 38.5 nmol/L.

A 2D echocardiography was suggestive of tiny patent ductus arteriosus, dilated right atrium and right ventricle, severe tricuspid regurgitation, and severe pulmonary arterial hypertension.

Ultrasonography of cranium was suggestive of mild prominence of cortical sulci of the bilateral cerebral hemisphere which was planned for further follow-up with Magnetic Resonannce Imaging (MRI) brain but was refused by attendants. A further genetic analysis was also declined for the reason of economic constraints.

The baby was stabilised under a radiant warmer in emergency and oxygen via hood was provided at 5 liters, intravenous fluids were started to maintain euglycaemia, and was shifted to neonatal intensive care unit for further management. Orthopaedic consultation was taken, the left arm was braced and paracetamol at 10 mg/kg/dose 8th hourly was started as an analgesic. Brainstem Evoked Response Audiometry (BERA) was planned. Calcium gluconate 10% was added at a dose of 8 mL/kg in intravenous fluids. Oral sildenafil 1 mg/kg/dose 8th hourly was added for severe pulmonary arterial hypertension. As the baby’s general condition improved, Orogastric (OG) feeds were started on day 3 and progressed to bowl spoon feeds on day 5 of life and intravenous fluids were stopped. Neonate was started on oral calcium (80mg/kg) and 1000 IU/day of vitamin D3. The baby remained stable till day 10 of life when he developed multifocal seizures which were managed with injection midazolam 0.1 mg/kg stat and injection calcium gluconate 2 mL/kg stat followed by 8 mL/kg/day 48 hourly was given. Neonate was euglycaemic at the time and serum electrolytes were in the normal range except for hypocalcaemia (6.7 mg/dL). Neonate developed repeated episodes of apnoea requiring bag and mask ventilation on day 11, so was intubated and mechanically ventilated. The sepsis screen was negative. Calcium supplements were increased to 100 mg/kg/day. The baby was stabilised and OG feeds were restarted on day 11 of life. Neonate gradually improved 2in the subsequent days, but the attendant refused treatment citing familial problems, and took the neonate home against medical advice on day 16 of life. Neonate was advised to continue calcium and vitamin D3 supplementation at home. Neonate was followed up telephonically on day 20 and was fed on cow’s milk by feeding bottle which he was able to suck. Telephonic call on day 25 revealed that the neonate expired on day 23 of life after developing breathing difficulty and no medical aid was sought.
 
 
Discussion

The OI is a hereditary condition characterised by increased bone fragility and varied clinical features. It is caused by a defect in type I collagen which synthesises skin, bone, and other connective tissue (1). The incidence of OI is 6-7 per 100000 (2). Sillence et.al., classified OI into four groups namely I to IV but with further research and genetic testing, groups V to XI were also incorporated in the classification by Cole WG (3). Type 1 is the most common and type 2 is the most severe form (4).

OI should be considered in the differential diagnosis of non-accidental trauma presenting with multiple fractures. Rickets, child abuse, osteomalacia, and other skeletal syndromes with bone fragility and deformity should also need to be thought of. The most common clinical feature is bone fragility which is present in most of the subtypes. Specific clinical features as described by Van Dijk FS and Sillence DO (5) are present. However, correct subtype diagnosis clinically remains difficult. Diagnosis remains simple whenever most of the clinical features of a subtype are present in a case. A high index of suspicion needs for suspecting a diagnosis. In a case series reported by John BM et al., clinical presentation can vary and includes frog-leg attitude, protuberant abdomen, macrocephaly, large anterior fontanel, short limbs with marked bowing, and a blue sclera (6). A case reported by Bhat YR and Prakashini K also presented with similar findings (7) Bayram S et al., reported a case who became distressed during handling and had multiple atraumatic fractures which were managed clinically (8). Similarly in the present study, the baby moaned and cried whenever handled.

The main radiographic features of OI are osteopenia, bone fractures and bone deformities (9),(10). In our case, considering the clinical presentation and radiological findings, it fits more with type III. A genetic test would have helped in reaching a correct diagnosis but was not feasible owing to financial constraints. A multidisciplinary team comprising of neonatologists, orthopaedician, physiotherapists, audiologists, and dieticians is required for management (11). Bisphosphonates are used in OI to increase bone mass and reduce the risk of fractures, long bone deformities, and increasing mobility (12).

Delivery of the baby should be gentle, if diagnosed antenatally with minimal manipulation at birth to avoid the risk of fractures. Due to respiratory distress and limited mobility of the thoracic cavity, baby needs to be feed through the OG route and appropriate calorie and protein intake should be maintained. Patients who are discharged from the hospital need special care at home to avoid fractures. Physiotherapy remains an important intervention to achieve improvement of muscle strength and ability (13).
 
 
Conclusion

Osteogenesis imperfecta is an uncommon diagnosis and a high index of suspicion is required for detecting early. A multidisciplinary team is required for management. Genetic counseling should be offered to parents to avoid recurrence of the disease which remains a lethal condition in most cases.
 
vioft2nnt8|20168B9C207A|jcdrorgin_ijnmr_frontend|Articles|article_references|0xe3fffb9c09000000dd01000001000a00
REFERENCES
1.
Beary JF, Chines AA. Osteogenesis imperfecta: Clinical features and diagnosis. 2019. https://www.uptodate.com/contents/osteogenesis-imperfecta-clinical-features-and-diagnosis.   [Google Scholar]
2.
Tauer J, Robinson M, Rauch F. Osteogenesis imperfecta: New perspectives from clinical and translational research. JBMR Plus. 2019;3(8):e10174.   [Google Scholar]
3.
Cole WG. The Nicholas Andry Award-1996. The molecular pathology of osteogenesis imperfecta. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1997;(343):235-48.   [Google Scholar]
4.
Marini JC. Osteogenesis Imperfecta. In Kliegman RM, Stanton BF, Nina FS, Joseph WS, editors. Nelson Textbook of Paediatrics, 20th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 2016:3380-3384.   [Google Scholar]
5.
Van Dijk FS, Sillence DO. Osteogenesis imperfecta: Clinical diagnosis, nomenclature and severity   [Google Scholar]
6.
John BM, Patnaik SK, Thergaonkar RW. Multiple fractures in neonates and Osteogenesis Imperfecta. Medical Journal Armed Forces India. 2006;62:73-74.   [Google Scholar]
7.
Bhat YR, Prakashini K. A neonate with multiple fractures. J Clin Diagn Res. 2009;3(1):1326-28.   [Google Scholar]
8.
Bayram S, Mert L, Anarat FB, Chodza M, Ergin ÖN. A newborn with multiple fractures in osteogenesis imperfecta: A case report. J Orthop Case Rep. 2018;8(3):71-73.   [Google Scholar]
9.
Renaud A, Aucourt J, Weill J, Bigot J, Dieux A, Devisme L, et al. Radiographic features of osteogenesis imperfecta. Insights Imaging. 2013;4(4):417-29.   [Google Scholar]
10.
Mbono Betoko RC, Ngo Um Sap S, Ngo Yamben MA, Tony Nengom J, Koki Ndombo P. Osteogenesis Imperfecta in neonatal period in Cameroon: A case report. Clin Case Rep. 2021;9:526-30.   [Google Scholar]
11.
Marr C, Seasman A, Bishop N. Managing the patient with osteogenesis imperfecta: A multidisciplinary approach. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2017;10:145-55. Doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S113483.   [Google Scholar]
12.
Graaff F, Verra W, Pruijs J. Decrease in outpatient department visits and operative interventions due to bisphosphonates in children with osteogenesis imperfect. J Child Orthop. 2011;5(2):121-25.   [Google Scholar]
13.
Binder H, Conway A, Gerber LH. Rehabilitation approaches to children with osteogenesis imperfecta: A ten-year experience. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993;74:386-90.   [Google Scholar]
 
TABLES AND FIGURES
[Table/Fig-1] [Table/Fig-2]
 
 
 

In This Article

  • Abstract
  • Material and Methods
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Conclusion
  • References

Article Utilities

  • Readers Comments
  • Article in PDF
  • Citation Manager
  • How to Cite
  • Article Statistics
  • Link to PUBMED
  • Print this Article
  • Send to a Friend

Quick Links

REVIEWER
ACCESS STATISTICS
Home  |  About Us  |  Online First  |  Current Issue  |  Simple Search  |  Advance Search  |  Register  |  Login  |  Contact  | 
IJNMR Pre-Publishing  |  Reviewer  |  Articles Archive  |  Access Statistics
© 2023 INDIAN JOURNAL OF NEONATAL MEDICINE & RESEARCH (IJNMR), ISSN : 2277-8527.
EDITORIAL OFFICE : 3rd Floor, Hemraj Jain Building, 4352 Pahari Dhiraj, Delhi, India 110006,Phone : 01123848553

* This Journal is owned and run by medical professionals *